It was inappropriate and uncalled for.
Technically not one new fact has been uncovered. This had already been rumored, then suspected a long time ago.
It stopped there, simply because I don't want this question answered. I figured that some questions, no matter how important, are best left unanswered and ambiguous.
Not answering this question alone provided a great force of motivation, and a large undefined territory for maneuvering.
It was advantageous not to talk about the details. As long as there was a general understanding on what must be respected, no one saw the need to talk straight.
Whatever that came set this wall of ambiguity on fire, and earthquakes through lands. The perpetrator himself wouldn't even see or be required to take responsibility for such destruction.
In fact no one would see the real depth of the damage caused.
All that subtlety and grace built up over the months came tumbling down in seconds.
This really brought home the idea of how certain areas in people's privacy should remain untouched, even if such areas were not explicitly banned. You wouldn't even end up knowing and understanding what damage you've caused.
Of course the perpetrator is not to be blamed. You cannot blame someone who fired a gun but don't know yet that a gun kills. After all it was me who suggested to everyone about taking out their guns.
All I can say is, never again.
While still reeling from the shock of that damage, it is time to rationalize and find my place in this new reality.
Reality always rules. Not at all a wrong concept, but at times it kills beauty...
No comments:
Post a Comment